From: Anselm R. Garbe <garbeam@wmii.de>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 12:33:22 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: several fixes
X-Git-Url: https://jasonwoof.com/gitweb/?p=dwm.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=b72588746f3d1548283ca98f90961b4f8c2e2800

several fixes
---

diff --git a/dev.c b/dev.c
index b25d9e3..5ececdf 100644
--- a/dev.c
+++ b/dev.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ static Key key[] = {
 	{ Mod1Mask, XK_k, sel, "prev" }, 
 	{ Mod1Mask, XK_j, sel, "next" }, 
 	{ Mod1Mask, XK_t, tiling, NULL }, 
-	{ Mod1Mask, XK_f, tiling, NULL }, 
+	{ Mod1Mask, XK_f, floating, NULL }, 
 	{ Mod1Mask, XK_m, max, NULL }, 
 	{ Mod1Mask | ShiftMask, XK_c, ckill, NULL }, 
 	{ Mod1Mask | ShiftMask, XK_q, quit, NULL },
diff --git a/dwm.html b/dwm.html
index 948192c..d1602fb 100644
--- a/dwm.html
+++ b/dwm.html
@@ -28,9 +28,9 @@
 		and all this hype about remote control through a 9P service, I only
 		want to manage my windows in a simple, but dynamic way. wmii never got
 		finished because I listened to users, who proposed arbitrary ideas I
-		considered useful. This resulted in an extreme <a href="http://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.html">CADT model</a>
-		of developmentwhich was basically my mistake. Thus the philosophy of
-		dwm is to fit my needs. That's it.
+		considered useful. This resulted in an extreme <a href="http://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.html">CADT</a>
+		development model, which was a mistake. Thus the philosophy of
+		dwm is simply <i>to fit my needs</i> (maybe yours as well). That's it.
 		</p>
 		<h3>Differences to wmii</h3	
 		<p>